First-party sources checked 2026-07-15

Coldrig vs Maildoso: cheapest raw mailboxes, normalized by daily send cap

We're not going to dodge this one: Maildoso's raw per-mailbox price is the cheapest we've found in this comparison set, and it stays cheaper even after normalizing for its much lower per-mailbox daily sending cap. Choose Maildoso when raw mailbox cost is the dominant factor and you're prepared to run your own sequencing, warmup coordination, and compliance logic on top. Choose Coldrig when you want mailbox provisioning, warmup, campaigns, and replies as one agent-driven lifecycle, with better agent discoverability, at a higher but still bounded price.

No fabricated numbers Every Maildoso figure below is sourced from maildoso.ai's own pricing page, fetched directly 2026-07-15 (confirms the same figures a same-day research pass recorded). Coldrig figures come from the current pricing page. No deliverability comparison is made.
MCP access — resolved An earlier research pass flagged Maildoso's MCP surface as under-documented. Today's live fetch confirms Maildoso's own product description: "Pay-per-mailbox cold email infrastructure: self-healing mailboxes, IP rotation, CAPTCHA domain protection, mailbox reputation measurements, API and MCP access, free deliverability audits, and a 30-day money-back guarantee" — bundled on every plan, not gated to a higher tier. We could not find a published list of specific MCP tools or a docs page describing the exact surface it exposes, so we're not claiming a tool count.

Fast decision table

RequirementMaildosoColdrig
Raw mailbox price$0.50–$2.50/mailbox/mo depending on volume; custom volumes from $0.49/mailbox$19.80/mailbox at 5, down to $10.82/mailbox at 60 (see pricing table below)
Per-mailbox daily sending cap15 cold emails/day (Google Workspace) or 15 cold/day (SMTP), plus a separate warm-up allowancePublished, server-enforced warmup ramp — 5/day in week one, rising to 40/day once fully warmed on day 29 (see the deliverability guide); 30/day is the conservative planning assumption used for capacity math once warmed
Domains includedIncluded free only on legacy quarterly plans; monthly-plan customers buy separately at $12/yearIncluded automatically, roughly one domain per 2-3 mailboxes
MCP / API accessIncluded on every plan (resolved above)Included at every tier
Agent discoverability (llms.txt, server-card.json)Both 404 — no llms.txt, no MCP server-card discovery file foundBoth live — llms.txt, server card
Unsubscribe / List-Unsubscribe automationWe could not confirm from Maildoso's public site whether this is automatic or a manual per-campaign setting — not asserting either way; verify directly with Maildoso before relying on it for complianceSuppression and unsubscribe enforced server-side by default
Money-back guarantee30-day money-back guarantee on every planNo refunds on the unused portion of a paid period (see Terms) — month-to-month, cancel anytime; paid activation is live in production today
Live production track recordYes — a shipped, live-sending productNot yet — real sending is live in production as of today (see FAQ), but Coldrig has no established multi-year track record, and mailbox send-authorization completes on our side (everything before that is self-serve and automatic)

Where Maildoso is honestly stronger

Where Coldrig's design is different

Pricing, normalized: cost per 100 sends/day

Comparing raw $/mailbox alone is misleading here, because Maildoso's mailboxes are capped at 15 cold emails/day on Google Workspace mailboxes (25/day during warm-up) — well below the 30/day planning assumption used elsewhere on this page for a fully warmed Coldrig mailbox (up to 40/day server-enforced ceiling). Both platforms enforce a per-mailbox daily ceiling; the comparison that matters is the number, not whether a ceiling exists at all. The table below normalizes both platforms to cost per 100 sends of daily capacity, using Maildoso's own published cap and Coldrig's own published planning assumption.

Platform / tierMonthly priceMailboxesPer-mailbox daily capTotal daily capacityCost per 100 sends/day
Maildoso — 30 mailboxes$753015/day450/day$16.67
Maildoso — 300 mailboxes$22530015/day4,500/day$5.00
Maildoso — 1,000 mailboxes$4991,00015/day15,000/day$3.33
Coldrig — 5 mailboxes$995≈30/day (planning assumption)≈150/day$66.00
Coldrig — 20 mailboxes$24920≈30/day (planning assumption)≈600/day$41.50
Coldrig — 60 mailboxes$64960≈30/day (planning assumption)≈1,800/day$36.06

Even normalized, Maildoso is substantially cheaper per unit of daily sending capacity. Coldrig's per-mailbox planning assumption (≈30 sends/day) is not a purchased allowance or contractual guarantee — actual safe daily volume depends on warmup stage, mailbox health, and provider rules, exactly as it would on any platform (see what counts as a mailbox). Neither platform sells send credits as a metered product: Maildoso's per-mailbox price includes its 15/day technical ceiling, and Coldrig's mailbox price includes its own server-enforced ramp ceiling (up to 40/day) — Coldrig has no send quota on top of that; sends themselves are not the billing meter on either platform. The honest reason to pay more per unit of capacity on Coldrig is the layer above the mailbox: sequencing, reply handling, suppression, and agent-native discoverability bundled into the same price, not sold separately or left to your own build.

Bottom line

If raw mailbox cost is the dominant constraint and you're prepared to build or bring your own sequencing, warmup coordination, and compliance logic, Maildoso is a genuinely better deal — we'd rather say so clearly than dress up a losing number. If the requirement is one agent-driven lifecycle across infrastructure, campaigns, and replies, with domains bundled and agent discovery files that actually resolve, Coldrig is doing more per dollar even though the sticker price is higher.

Related

Sources and verification